South Beach Diet - it's worth it for vegetarians?

Is the South Beach Diet something that vegetarians consider? There's something about this latest craze in the U.S. diet, which is worth considering?
The average vegetarian is generally much less concerned about losing weight than the general population.
However, there are also vegetarians who may feel that they need to add a component of the diet feeding behavior - and in more than 5 million copies of the book on South> Beach Diet have flown off the shelves of bookstores, "should be considered a vegetarian?

One of the reasons the diet is popular because it promises quick results - a weight loss of up to 13 pounds in just 14 days! And if you're going to penalize watch the pros and cons of the South Beach diet is the first.
Many dietitians and nutritionists are extremely careful about such rapid weight loss. The generally accepted desirable number is 2pounds per week - a huge difference.
The South Beach Diet was developed by Dr. Agatston patients, an American cardiologist, for his heart.
While his primary focus was to improve the health of the heart, found that as a side benefit of his patients also lost much weight.

Dr. Agatston did not favor either the low-carb or low-fat route - said that the South Beach Diet "fats is based on eating the" right "carbs and" right. are actuallyDiet pays much attention to the glycemic index, which is in theory good for diabetics and vegetarians alike - but his approach "progressive" is the second disadvantage at least for the more rigorous selection of vegetarian options.
There are three stages in the South Beach diet.

In Phase 1 of the carbohydrate intake is extremely low, the emphasis is on fish to eat, chicken, lean meat, eggs, low fat cheese, nuts and olive oil - so right there is no problem for vegansOvo-lacto-ovo-vegetarians e.

Phase 2 is much easier for vegetarians - the focus is on low-glycemic carbohydrates, including most fruits, whole grain bread, whole grains, pasta and low-fat milk, beans and even wine red.
Dieters told to stay away from baked goods made with refined grains, some vegetables (potatoes, beets, carrots) and some fruits (bananas, pineapple and watermelon).

Phase 3 is even easier to follow, the theory is now that you "changed your eatingHabits "(not exactly news for vegetarians) and behave in a food for the rest of your life, using assumed.
If your weight begins to rise again, it goes back to step 2.
Summarized as follows:

The good news is that you control your diet away from saturated fats with monounsaturated fats (olive oil), emphasizes whole grains (phase 2), avoiding carbohydrates, sugar, and emphasizes fruits and vegetables, low sugar. You do not have to starve or fast, and as ifexpected to be a cardiologist, is the approach all the best for heart health.
The diet is reasonable, does not eliminate one of the major food groups, there is a portion size limit, no need to count calories, recommends lots of fruits and vegetables, and is generally in line with the principles of healthy eating.

The not so good is the approval of yellow plastic and others (which are loaded with trans fats) instead of butter (this is the healthyOption), the very low level of carbohydrates in phase 1 permits, and for all, but a semi-vegetarian, the value of lean meat in the beginning.
Some experts even believe that the rapid weight loss in the first two weeks due to water loss from the decrease in carbohydrate intake, rather than cause you to lose real weight and the weight is when you return to a normal diet possible in Step 2.

Overall, the food is worth a consideration only of semi-vegetarians, in particularwhen they start Phase 1 with Phase 2, however - and if you are already a vegetarian instincts, probably would not need to "discipline" your body a chance to start a non-vegetarian diet South Beach.

It's a Low Carb (Atkins, South Beach) diet safe? Carbohydrates are not necessary for your health?

There are only three components for all food, food for the human body - proteins, fats and carbohydrates. Only two of the three are absolutely necessary for human life (with water), and do not know. Can anyone advise me, not the component is required?

If the title does not give you an 'idea, the answer is "carbohydrate." There are, in fact, companies that grow quite well with little or no carbohydrates in their diet - Australian Aborigines and Eskimos are twoExamples. The fact that you can be very healthy and live a long life without carbohydrates in general, should be a wake-up call for those of you who believe the USDA recommended levels of carbohydrates.

In 1989, the USDA has recommended that, more than 50% of calories from carbohydrates. Fast forward to 2002, and changed the recommendation to only some 45%, and that at least 25 grams of carbohydrate should be on this fiber, and fewer than 25% of these areadded sugar.

There seems strange to those who ask the government not to eat more than a quarter of the calories from sugar? Prior to 1900 the average consumption of sugar is not more than 5 pounds a year ... E 'currently about £ 135 a year!

In fact, if you want to eat healthy, in fact its pretty hard to come up to the level of carbohydrates that the USDA is recommended, unless you eat a lot of garbage.

If youwant the maximum benefit from eating carbohydrates to win, you should try with nutritionally dense carbohydrates, such as vegetable sticks. When you eat a carrot or pumpkin and spinach - only you do not get the carbohydrates that are contained in the plant, but you're more fiber and vitamins - something that raw sugar is not you. (And no, the bread is not as a source "nutritionally dense" carbohydrates - is simple carbohydrates and fiber).

The USDA is in a corner of the farm -and is not to say the best way to eat a. Learn the facts and avoid the common "wisdom" of a healthy diet - and you will live to the end of a much healthier life.